The impact of donor cornea keratometry on post-keratoplasty keratometry
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
VOLUME: 39 ISSUE: 6
P: 469 - 476
November 2009

The impact of donor cornea keratometry on post-keratoplasty keratometry

Turk J Ophthalmol 2009;39(6):469-476
1.
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 05.06.2009
Accepted Date: 14.08.2009
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Conclusion:

Prediction of post-keratoplasty keratometries in the range of ± 1,00 diopter interval is possible at least in two years of postoperative period by using donor cornea keratometries as an indicator of final keratometry. Because of the absence of any other indicator for final post-keratoplasty keratometry, we recommend the obtaining of donor keratometries by eyebanks before the excision.

Results:

Mean keratometric values and standard deviatons was 43.24 ± 1.46 diopters for donor corneas and 39,89 ± 3,08; 40,35 ± 3,34; 41,18 ± 3,13; 44,31 ± 3,22 and 44,34 ± 3,33 diopters at postoperative month 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 for post-keratoplasty corneas, respectively. Statistically significant correlations were found between the keratometries of donor corneas and post-keratoplasty corneas at postoperative month 1, 6, 12 and 24 (p=0,007; p=0,037; p=0,022 and p=0,036, Pearson correlation analysis, respectively). Mean difference between the donor cornea keratometries and post-keratoplasty corneas at the postoperative month 24 was 1.09 diopters and 95 % confidence interval of this difference was ranging from 0,27 to 1,92 diopters (=1,09 ± 0,83 diopters).

Methods:

In this prospective observational study, donor corneas that will be used in penetrating keratoplasty surgeries were measured with portable autokeratometer before the excision. These measurements were compared with the measurements of graft keratometries following penetrating keratoplasty. All surgeries were performed with 0,25 mm larger donor button and all interrupted sutures. Corneal sutures were removed at the period ranging from postoperative month 13 to 15 months.

Purpose:

To investigate the significance of keratometric measurements of donor corneas before the excision as a predictive factor for post-keratoplasty keratometries.

Keywords:
Penetrating keratoplasty, portable keratometry, donor keratometry, graft Keratometry

References

1
Brierly SC, Izquerdo L, Mannis MJ, Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Cornea 2000,19-329
2
Insler MS, Helm CJ, Kaufman HE, Visual results after keratoplasty in patients with posterior chamber intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 1988,106-72
3
Samples JR, Binder PS, Visual acuity, refractive error, and astigmatism following corneal transplantation for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. Ophthalmology 1985,92-1554
4
Bland JM, Altman DG, Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986,1-307
5
Davis EA, Azar DT, Jakobs FM, Stark WJ, Refractive and keratometric results after triple procedure. Experience with early and late suture removal. Ophthalmology 1998,105-624
6
Duran JA, Malvar A, Diez F, Corneal dioptric power after penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 1989,73-657
7
Flowers CW, McLeod SD, McDonnell PJ, Irvine JA, Smith RE, Evaluation of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in the triple procedure. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996,22-116
8
Hjortdal JO, Ehlers N, Erdman L, Topography of corneal grafts before and after penetrating keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997,75-645
9
Isager P, Hjortdal JO, Ehlers N, Stability of graft refractive power after penetrating keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000,78-623
10
Katz HR, Forster RK, Intraocular lens calculation in combined penetrating keratoplasty, cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 1985,92-1203
11
Khokhar S, Sethi HS SR, Stabilisation of refractive power after penetrating keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2001,79-634
12
Kirkness CM, Cheong PY, Steele AD, Penetrating keratoplasty and cataract surgery: the advantages of an extracapsular technique combined with posterior chamber intraocular implantation. Eye 1987,1-557
13
Kramer SG, The triple procedure: cataract extraction in a different setting. Refract Corneal Surg 1991,7-51
14
Mattrax JB, McCulley JP, The effect of standardized keratoplasty technique on IOL power calculation for the triple procedure. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1989,192-24
15
Perry HD FG, Oversize donor buttons in corneal transplantation surgery for keratoconus. Ophthalmic Surg 1987,18-751
16
Pineros OE, Cohen EJ, Rapuano CJ, Laibson PR, Triple vs nonsimultaneous procedures in Fuchs&#39 dystrophy and cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 1996,114-525
17
Price FW, Jr, , Whitson WE. Visual results of suture-fixated posterior chamber lenses during penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1989,96-1234
18
Ramirez M, Hodge DO, Bourne WM, Keratometric results during the first year after keratoplasty: Adjustable single running suture technique versus double running suture technique. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 2001,32-370
19
Wilson SE, Bourne WM, Effect of recipient-donor trephine size disparity on refractive error in keratoconus. Ophthalmology 1989,96-299
20
Bayer A, Akin T, Mutlu FM, Bilge AH, Penetran keratoplasti uygulanan keratokon&uumls olgularinda greft ve alici yatak &ccedilapi farkinin postoperatif refraksiyona etkisi. MN Oftalmoloji 2001,8-137
21
Touzeau O, Borderie VM, Allouch C, Scheer S, Laroche L, Effects of penetrating keratoplasty suture removal on corneal topography and refraction. Cornea 1999,18-638
22
Egrilmez S, Yagci A, Egrilmez ED, Keratoplasti sonrasi astigmatizmada selektif s&uumlt&uumlr aliminin erken ve ge&ccedil d&oumlnem sonu&ccedillari. T Oft Gaz 2002,32-884
23
Por YM, Cheng JY, Parthasarathy A, Mehta JS, Tan DT, Outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2008,145-772
24
Szentmary N, Langenbucher A, Naumann GO, Seitz B, Intra-individual variability of penetrating keratoplasty outcome after excimer laser versus motorized corneal trephination. J Refract Surg 2006,22-804
25
Frost NA, Wu J, Lai TF, Coster DJ, A review of randomized controlled trials of penetrating keratoplasty techniques. Ophthalmology 2006,113-942
26
Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Kus MM, Kuchle M, Naumann GO, Nonmechanical corneal trephination with the excimer laser improves outcome after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1999,106-1156
27
Langenbucher A, Seitz B, Kus MM, Vilchis E, Naumann GO, Graft decentration in penetrating keratoplasty: nonmechanical trephination with the excimer laser (193 nm) versus the motor trephine. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1998,29-106
28
Thompson KP, Barraquer E, Parel JM, Loertscher H, Pflugfelder S, Roussel T et al, Potential use of lasers for penetrating keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 1989,15-397
29
Gilbard JP, Rossi SR, A centering device for the Hessburg-Barron vacuum trephine. Am J Ophthalmol 1988,106-633
30
Duffin RM, Olson RJ, Ohrloff C, Analysis of the Hessburg-Barron vacuum trephine. Ophthalmic Surg 1984,15-51
31
Alpar JJ, Long-term results of keratoplasty in eyes with intraocular lenses. Ophthalmic Surg 1986,17-650
32
Binder PS, The triple procedure. Refractive results. 1985 update. Ophthalmology 1986,93-1482
33
Bulut S, Akova YA, Onat S, Duman S, Penetran keratoplasti ile kombine ekstra kaps&uumller katarakt ekstraksiyonu ve intraok&uumller lens implantasyonu. MN Oftalmoloji 1998,5-321
34
Egrilmez S, Palamar M, Emre S, Yagci A, Penetran keratoplasti ve katarakt cerrahisi&uuml&ccedill&uuml girisime karsi iki-asamali girisimin refraktif ve g&oumlrsel sonu&ccedillari. T Oft Gaz 2005,35-212
35
Erkam N, Atilla H, Kombine keratoplasti. MN Oftalmoloji 1995,2-48
36
Ophthalmology 1990;, Ophthalmology 1990,97-1460
37
Yüksel B, Sezgin B, Karabacak M, Topaloglu E, Penetran keratoplasti sirasinda g&oumlz i&ccedili lens implantasyonu. MNOftalmoloji 2005,12-27
38
Liu Y, Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Nguyen NX, Naumann GO, Impact of preoperative corneal curvature on the outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Cornea 2003,22-409
39
Dave AS, McCulley JP, Demonstration of feasibility of application of a portable keratometer to cadaveric donor corneas. Cornea 1994,13-379
40
Preschel N, Hardten DR, Management of coincident corneal disease and cataract. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1999,10-59
41
Rao SK, Padmanabhan P, Combined phacoemulsification and penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1999,30-488
42
Ruusuvaara P, Setala K, The triple procedure. Penetrating keratoplasty, extracapsular cataract extraction and posterior chamber lens implantation. A clinical and specular microscopic study. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1987,65-433
43
Musch DC, Meyer RF, Prospective evaluation of a regression-determined formula for use in triple procedure surgery. Ophthalmology 1988,95-79
44
Shimmura S, Ohashi Y, Shiroma H, Shimazaki J, Tsubota K, Corneal opacity and cataract: triple procedure versus secondary approach. Cornea 2003,22-234
45
Binder PS, Intraocular lens implantation after penetrating keratoplasty. Refract Corneal Surg 1989,5-224
46
Ousley PJ, Terry MA, Use of a portable topography machine for screening donor tissue for prior refractive surgery. Cornea 2002,21-745
47
Manning CA, Kloess PM, Comparison of portable automated keratometry and manual keratometry for IOL calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997,23-1213